The discussion of fairness in sentencing is restricted to issues of procedural equity, or the degree to which sentencing decisions are made reliable. Release predictability involves providing inmates early in their prison stays with knowledge concerning their release dates. Sentencing equity and predictability depend on how the sentencing model is structured to deal with a series of discretionary decisions affecting criminal defendants throughout the judicial and correctional process. Six choice points are considered, three pertaining to the adjudication process and three to the postadjudication period. Relevant to the adjudication process are (1) the decision to incarcerate; (2) characteristics of the penalty scaling system, including numbers of penalty ranges and offense categories, and overlap among penalty ranges; and (3) other mechanisms, including aggravating and mitigating circumstances and concurrent and consecutive sentences. The following postadjudication processes were addressed: (4) the parole review process; (5) the use of good time; and (6) revocation from supervised release. Explication of the criteria for procedural equity and predictability should aid in defining parameters necessary for effective reform. Sixty-four references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Methamphetamine, Cocaine, and Other Psychostimulant Offenses in Federal Courts, 2022
- Minority Victim Neglect and the Case Processing of Firearm Crimes
- Policies and Procedures Manual for Monitoring Compliance With Core Requirements of the Formula Grants Program Authorized Under Title II, Part B of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act